Too big for twitter, not ready to blog = here. Uber-feed of all my other stuff. Mostly for me, so don't expect too much.
Search
Tags
- KM (9)
- seriousgames (8)
- flashgames (5)
- gameify (5)
- elearning (4)
- ISD (3)
- bloom (3)
- models (3)
- socialmedia (3)
- AR (2)
- View all 62 tags
- modelling (2)
- networks (2)
- polemic (2)
- teachable (2)
- unTeaching (2)
- ux (2)
- Community Management (1)
- Cynefin (1)
- DIKW (1)
- HRbrain (1)
- JIT (1)
- LX (1)
- agile (1)
- allocentric (1)
- boundary objects (1)
- business model (1)
- change (1)
- checklist (1)
- cleavefast (1)
- coaching (1)
- cowpaths (1)
- cubism (1)
- diversity (1)
- education (1)
- elements (1)
- enterprise (1)
- expertise (1)
- flow (1)
- futurealreadyhere (1)
- gestalt (1)
- halfbaked (1)
- historian (1)
- hmmmm (1)
- howto (1)
- innovation (1)
- ipad (1)
- journalist (1)
- kung fu (1)
- organisations (1)
- play (1)
- research (1)
- search (1)
- sims (1)
- slidedeck (1)
- spiral (1)
- strategy (1)
- studio-based learning (1)
- tech (1)
- tips (1)
- tools (1)
- training departments (1)
- web (1)
Archive
Performance and ADDIE Models
From one of the best Learning & Development blogs, a useful little tool for starting discussions with clients.
It's a constant struggle, though, to use this kind of thing without succumbing to toolism. And it's difficult to highlight the limits of tools without somehow diminishing their credibility.
I wonder if it would work for all tools to come with 'induction instructions' such that anybody using them would have a process/suggestions for eliciting them from a group.
Or, at least, for tools to come in different flavours - people don't engage if they feel a tool is imposed. Choice = engagement. Imposition = tools get chucked out by antibodies.
